Just scan the web and you can find autoblogging sites and formula article built sites… They’re mostly trash. Obviously written to serve the search engine and keyword instead of the human reader. I think they are actually designed to drive you nuts so you look for a link to click.
Is it every possible to automate writing and not produce 110% manure?
Possibly.
But it won’t be cheap.
Here’s how one programmer learned to do Automated Writing.
And here’s a summary of his opinion… automation can write about facts and figures… otherwise human writers need to intervene:
A common, and funny, question I get from journalists is: “when will you automate me out out of a job?” I find the question humorous because built into the question is the assumption that if our software can write the perfect story on a particular topic, then no one else should attempt to write about it. That’s just not going to happen. What’s happening instead is that media companies are using our software to help scale their businesses. Initially, that takes the form of generating stories on topics a media outlet didn’t have the resources to cover. In other cases, it means putting our stories through an editorial process that customizes the content to the specific needs of the publisher. You still need humans for that. There will be less of a need for folks to spend their time writing purely quantitative pieces, but that should be liberating. Now, they can focus on more qualitative, value-added commentary that humans are inherently good at. Quantitative stories can — and probably should — be mostly automated because computers are better at that.
Bottom Line: It’s not as easy as you think. In the end YOU have to add your content to what a computer churns out. It’s that simple.
Related Link: How To Make Money From Writing – Free Tutorial
No comments yet.