<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Bet Your Business On Google Voice Transcription!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://work-at-home.business-opportunities.biz/2009/10/30/dont-bet-your-business-on-google-voice-transcription/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://work-at-home.business-opportunities.biz/2009/10/30/dont-bet-your-business-on-google-voice-transcription/</link>
	<description>News, and links for WAH entrepreneurs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:04:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Offer Tsuriel</title>
		<link>http://work-at-home.business-opportunities.biz/2009/10/30/dont-bet-your-business-on-google-voice-transcription/comment-page-1/#comment-444302</link>
		<dc:creator>Offer Tsuriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://work-at-home.business-opportunities.biz/?p=5727#comment-444302</guid>
		<description>This is wht I foung on Gadgetwise regarding GoogleVoice:
&quot;The New York Times&#039; Gadgetwise blog asked its readers to call a Google Voice number and leave voicemails to test and stretch the service&#039;s transcription prowess. They responded with glee, reading parts of the Declaration of Independence (translation: &quot;We hope you straight to be self evident ...&quot;), Monty Python skits (&quot;this carriages no more in tennessee seems to be hey it&#039;s expired&quot;), and more. We gave Google Voice transcriptions a &quot;not bad,&quot; and it holds. It&#039;s fast and search-able, but don&#039;t rely on it—just yet, at least—for legal briefings or turn-by-turn instructions.&quot;

It&#039;s almost the same result like in your experiment. Thy did&#039;t improve it a bit!

I think soon we will forget about this service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is wht I foung on Gadgetwise regarding GoogleVoice:<br />
&#8220;The New York Times&#8217; Gadgetwise blog asked its readers to call a Google Voice number and leave voicemails to test and stretch the service&#8217;s transcription prowess. They responded with glee, reading parts of the Declaration of Independence (translation: &#8220;We hope you straight to be self evident &#8230;&#8221;), Monty Python skits (&#8220;this carriages no more in tennessee seems to be hey it&#8217;s expired&#8221;), and more. We gave Google Voice transcriptions a &#8220;not bad,&#8221; and it holds. It&#8217;s fast and search-able, but don&#8217;t rely on it—just yet, at least—for legal briefings or turn-by-turn instructions.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s almost the same result like in your experiment. Thy did&#8217;t improve it a bit!</p>
<p>I think soon we will forget about this service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

