<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just Sounding Off About Forbes And Work At Home Scheme Warnings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://work-at-home.business-opportunities.biz/2006/12/16/just-sounding-off-about-forbes-and-work-at-home-scheme-warnings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://work-at-home.business-opportunities.biz/2006/12/16/just-sounding-off-about-forbes-and-work-at-home-scheme-warnings/</link>
	<description>News, and links for WAH entrepreneurs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:21:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Home Business &#187; Just Sounding Off About Forbes And Work At Home Scheme Warnings</title>
		<link>http://work-at-home.business-opportunities.biz/2006/12/16/just-sounding-off-about-forbes-and-work-at-home-scheme-warnings/comment-page-1/#comment-40283</link>
		<dc:creator>Home Business &#187; Just Sounding Off About Forbes And Work At Home Scheme Warnings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 08:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://work-at-home.business-opportunities.biz/2006/12/16/just-sounding-off-about-forbes-and-work-at-home-scheme-warnings/#comment-40283</guid>
		<description>[...] Does it seem to you that when a magazine has nothing better to say that they decide run an article about &#8220;home business scams&#8221; and &#8220;work at home schemes&#8221;? They trot out the same tired examples&#8230; stuffing envelopes, chain letters, pyramid schemes etc. blah, blah, blah. And of course they are wrong about some of the &#8220;scams&#8221; [&#8230;]Read full entry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does it seem to you that when a magazine has nothing better to say that they decide run an article about &#8220;home business scams&#8221; and &#8220;work at home schemes&#8221;? They trot out the same tired examples&#8230; stuffing envelopes, chain letters, pyramid schemes etc. blah, blah, blah. And of course they are wrong about some of the &#8220;scams&#8221; [&#8230;]Read full entry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
